Research · Live multi-brand
Live multi-brand pilot — real AI responses
6 tracked brands · 72/72 answers · 3 runs per prompt · OpenAI only · bare buyer prompts. Cross-engine comparison comes later — this panel measures within-OpenAI consistency.
AI visibility benchmark: code review tools (OpenAI × 3)
We measure where brands are consistently recommended across repeated unbranded buyer-prompt runs — not a one-shot mention check.
Leader: GitHub Copilot — stable unbranded coverage 61%
Recommended in at least 2 of 3 runs on 11/18 unbranded prompts.
Stable recommendation coverage
Share of 18 unbranded prompts where the brand was recommended in ≥2 of 3 independent OpenAI runs.
| Brand | Stable (≥2/3) | Mention | Recommendation |
|---|---|---|---|
| GitHub Copilot | 61% (11/18) | 59% | 57% |
| CodeRabbit | 56% (10/18) | 57% | 54% |
| Qodo | 56% (10/18) | 56% | 52% |
| Greptile | 39% (7/18) | 44% | 41% |
| Graphite | 28% (5/18) | 31% | 24% |
| Ellipsis | 0% (0/18) | 2% | 0% |
Where the leader flips between runs
Unbranded prompts whose top recommended brand changed across the 3 repeats — high-value publish opportunities.
- “best AI code review tools” — CodeRabbit / GitHub Copilot (modal: CodeRabbit)
- “leading AI code review products right now” — CodeRabbit / GitHub Copilot (modal: CodeRabbit)
- “which AI tools help teams review pull requests” — GitHub Copilot / CodeRabbit (modal: GitHub Copilot)
- “affordable PR review for small teams” — CodeRabbit / Bito AI Code Reviews (modal: GitHub Copilot)
- “AI PR review for open source maintainers” — CodeRabbit / GitHub Copilot (modal: GitHub Copilot)
Citation domains
From OpenRouter url_citation annotations (54/72 answers).
- docs.coderabbit.ai33
- greptile.com31
- github.com26
- docs.github.com23
- docs.qodo.ai19
- qodo.ai19
- coderabbit.ai16
- graphite.com13
- docs.gitlab.com11
- docs.sonarsource.com8
- docs.cursor.com6
- sonarsource.com5
- semgrep.dev5
- docs.aws.amazon.com5
- graphite.dev5
- docs.bito.ai4
Prompt-level evidence
Each row is one buyer prompt () across repeat runs when available. Top recommended is the modal pick across runs (any brand).
| Buyer prompt | GitHub Copilot | Top recommended | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|
Category · unbranded “best AI code review tools” | Rec 3/3 | CodeRabbit | |
Category · unbranded “top automated PR review platforms” | Rec 3/3 | CodeRabbit | |
Category · unbranded “best tools for AI-assisted code review” | Rec 3/3 | CodeRabbit | |
Category · unbranded “recommended AI pull request review software” | Rec 3/3 | CodeRabbit | |
Category · unbranded “leading AI code review products right now” | Rec 3/3 | CodeRabbit | |
Category · unbranded “which AI tools help teams review pull requests” | Rec 3/3 | GitHub Copilot | |
Segment · unbranded “best AI code review tool for startups” | Rec 3/3 | CodeRabbit | |
Segment · unbranded “affordable PR review for small teams” | Rec 2/3 | GitHub Copilot | |
Segment · unbranded “AI code review for enterprise engineering orgs” | Rec 2/3 | GitHub Copilot | |
Segment · unbranded “best AI code review for GitHub-heavy teams” | Rec 3/3 | CodeRabbit | |
Segment · unbranded “AI PR review for open source maintainers” | Rec 3/3 | GitHub Copilot | |
Segment · unbranded “lightweight AI code review for agencies” | Men 1/3 | Greptile | |
Problem · unbranded “how to catch bugs before merging pull requests” | Miss 0/3 | — | |
Problem · unbranded “how to reduce manual code review workload” | Miss 0/3 | — | |
Problem · unbranded “how can I get faster PR feedback without hiring more reviewers” | Miss 0/3 | — | |
Problem · unbranded “ways to improve code quality before merge with automation” | Miss 0/3 | — | |
Problem · unbranded “how do teams avoid buggy merges in fast-moving product orgs” | Miss 0/3 | — | |
Problem · unbranded “how to standardize code review quality across a growing eng team” | Miss 0/3 | — | |
Comparison · branded “alternatives to CodeRabbit” | Rec 3/3 | Qodo | |
Comparison · branded “Greptile vs CodeRabbit” | Miss 0/3 | CodeRabbit | |
Comparison · branded “Graphite vs CodeRabbit for code review” | Men 1/3 | CodeRabbit | |
Comparison · branded “is CodeRabbit worth it for small teams” | Men 1/3 | CodeRabbit | |
Comparison · branded “CodeRabbit competitors for AI PR review” | Rec 3/3 | Qodo | |
Comparison · branded “CodeRabbit vs manual code review” | Men 1/3 | CodeRabbit |
Reproducibility
Run: BP-CODE-20260721-04 Started: 2026-07-21 10:47:15 UTC Published: 2026-07-21 12:01:20 UTC Prompt set: code-review-v1 Tracked brands: CodeRabbit, GitHub Copilot, Qodo, Greptile, Graphite, Ellipsis Runs per prompt: 3 Model requested: openai/gpt-5.6-luna Model returned: openai/gpt-5.6-luna Provider: OpenAI Web search: openrouter:web_search (engine=native) Parser: google/gemini-3.1-flash-lite (research-parse-v3) Temperature: 0.7 Locale / market: en / GLOBAL Successful responses: 72/72 Failed: 0 · retried slots: 7 Answers with citations: 54 · annotation hits: 332
Run this on your brand
Free OpenAI audit builds ~20–30 buyer prompts for your category and competitors. Paid unlock adds Perplexity, Gemini, Claude, and Grok — cross-engine agreement, separate from this within-OpenAI consistency panel.
Find my lost buyer prompts