Sample report · fictional brand
Northloop — AI Visibility Report
Three layers in one report: who AI recommends, which sites it cites, and what to publish so you show up. This sample mirrors a free ChatGPT run; your paid unlock runs the same structure across all 6 engines.
northloop.dev · AI code review tools · Sample checked on ChatGPT · Full product also covers ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini, Claude, DeepSeek, Qwen
- Mention rate
- 18%
- Recommendation rate
- 7%
- Citation rate (brand)
- 8%
- Avg. list position
- 4.2
Score 28/100: AI rarely names Northloop on buyer prompts and almost never recommends it. CodeRabbit wins the same questions ~3–4× more often. See the prompt table below for the raw evidence behind these rates.
Prompt-level evidence
Sample of buyer prompts run for this fictional brand. Expand a row to see the AI answer excerpt and cited sources.
| Buyer prompt | Northloop | Winner | Source | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|
“Best AI code review tools” | Missing | CodeRabbit | G2 | |
“CodeRabbit alternatives” | #4 | Greptile | Product Hunt | |
“Affordable PR review tool” | Recommended | Northloop | northloop.dev | |
“Which tool should I use to review PRs?” | Missing | CodeRabbit | G2 | |
“best AI code review tools for startups” | Missing | CodeRabbit | Product Hunt | |
“Greptile vs CodeRabbit” | Missing | CodeRabbit | G2 | |
“how do I catch bugs before merge without slowing PRs” | Missing | Graphite | docs.github.com | |
“Northloop review” | Mentioned | Northloop | northloop.dev | |
“cheaper alternatives to CodeRabbit” | #3 | Greptile | G2 | |
“AI code review for small B2B SaaS teams” | Missing | CodeRabbit |
Competitor gap
| Brand | Mention rate | Recommendation rate |
|---|---|---|
| Northloop (you) | 18% | 7% |
| CodeRabbit | 72% | 58% |
| Greptile | 41% | 29% |
| Graphite | 33% | 18% |
Source gap
Domains most frequently appearing as citations inside AI answers (not Google SERP results).
- g2.com14
- coderabbit.ai11
- producthunt.com9
- reddit.com7
- graphite.dev6
- docs.github.com5
- northloop.dev2
Source gap above counts domains that appeared as AI answer citations. Separately, we may run Google search (via Serper) on category/alternative prompts for ranking context — that search data is not mixed into this citation chart. Details: Methodology.
Recommended actions
1. Publish /alternatives/coderabbit with a clear feature comparison table
high impact
On “best CodeRabbit alternatives” prompts, AI names CodeRabbit and Greptile but almost never Northloop — and the pages cited are competitor comparison posts, not yours.
Competitors currently winning here: CodeRabbit, Greptile
2. Add FAQPage schema to pricing + “how it works” covering buyer objections
high impact
Problem prompts (“how do I catch bugs before merge without slowing PRs”) get narrative answers with no Northloop mention. Structured FAQ content is what AI web-search can lift and cite.
Competitors currently winning here: CodeRabbit
3. Rewrite the Product Hunt listing around category + competitor keywords
medium impact
Product Hunt shows up repeatedly in citation sources for this category. Your listing is thin on “AI code review” and competitor phrasing, so it rarely gets pulled into answers.
Competitors currently winning here: Graphite, CodeRabbit
4. Ship a public “Northloop vs Greptile” page with pricing and eval criteria
high impact
ALTERNATIVE prompts for Greptile cite Greptile’s own site and G2. Without a dedicated comparison URL, assistants have nothing of yours to recommend or link.
Competitors currently winning here: Greptile
5. Publish 3 customer stories with measurable review-time outcomes
medium impact
When Northloop is mentioned, sentiment is often neutral (“another option”) rather than recommended. Specific outcome stories give models quotable proof.
Competitors currently winning here: CodeRabbit
Each action is a concrete page, schema, or listing move tied to prompts you're losing — the playbook for getting into AI answers.
How this score was built
Visibility Score weights mention rate (40%), recommendation rate (30%), brand citation rate (20%), and positive sentiment share (10%). This sample is a single ChatGPT snapshot with web search enabled — not a continuous monitor. Full methodology.
Free vs full
Free audit = ChatGPT + source gap + action plan. Paid unlock adds Perplexity, Gemini, Claude, DeepSeek, Qwen on the same prompts, plus a ChatGPT before/after after you ship fixes.
Audit your brand free